Score: 2

"Very bad controls for a outdated game"

submission: Time Fcuk

date: September 19, 2009

The graphics were not good to look at, I apreciate you're trying to be clever by making it look old, but it just doesn't fit.

The sound is obviously awful, very grindy, something softer on the ears would have been better.

The controls were the worst thing about it, they were so counter-intuitive it's
unbelievable.

The gameplay is really dull and fiddly. I spent a long time on early levels and I had to do a very fiddly bit of controlling which didn't feel smooth. This isn't helped by the poor controls.

All things considered, in my opinion, this is not a good game at all, it needs the outlined issues addressed. That being said, it's clearly had a lot of promotion behind it so it will undoubtably make you a few quid based on that.

Score: 6

"Funny. But you're a girl :P"

submission: Dollar

date: June 20, 2008

Cool animation. You are a whiner though, you think your gas prices have gone up, try buying gas in a country that doesnt go to war for cheap petrol!

Once again, nice one though :)

Score: 10

"Awesome copy..."

submission: Magic Pen

date: April 7, 2008

Argh I just can't help but give it 10/10 because I love it oh so very much. I've beaten it twice

I am a bit upset that you stole the idea 100% from the author of crayon physics. Are you sure that's legal?

Also you didn't write the physics engine either... but I don't care, you made an amazing game albeit mostly not yours :)

Score: 9

"Excellent game idea!"

submission: SHIFT

date: February 2, 2008

This was very very well executed.

However, be honest, did you really think of this idea? The reason I ask is because it is the exact concept which this guy was handing out for free:

http://www.squidi.net/three/entry.php ?id=1

It's fine if you did use his idea, but I'd like you to be honest and say you did.

Otherwise this is just a huge coincidence :)

Score: 10

"Very cool game! Well thought out"

submission: Mental

date: January 26, 2008

When you beat level 1, there was another level to beat. This game really has been thought through and it plays very well. There was a tiny glitch on level 2 where the big guy would stand a few pixels above the floor and not be able to go through doors, but when you zoom out the problem fixes itself.

Amazing work, I'll be sure to look out for any future games you make :)

Score: 3

"0/10 for effort."

submission: Bloons Player Pack 3

date: January 14, 2008

This is actualy worse then the last ones. I think the first one was a nice success. You have milked it so much though, I'm starting to hate the site of the whole lot. Are these levels even created by you? It seem's you do less and less work on this game each time you release a new one.

Also it lagged immensly between levels... So this really is worse then the last one...

Score: 7

"Nahhhh"

submission: Command & Conquer TE

date: July 24, 2007

Sprites arent yours, lets face it. Maybe you modded them, but still it's copyrighted material, aside from that the story was kinda corny, and the voice acting was sub par. I liked the bit with the engineer going "mornin'" only to be shot. I can see you worked hard on it though so high score :D
Anything with effort deserves 7/10.
Good luck with any future movies you make

Score: 9

"Hilarious! Great gameplay"

submission: Nicholas' WeirdAdventure2

date: July 19, 2007

Hilarious!
Do more! I love your stuffs!

Score: 8

"Great game"

submission: Dad 'n Me

date: July 17, 2007

Why's it back on fp though?

Score: 9

"Wow that was nice"

submission: Castle III part D

date: January 27, 2007

Keep up the awesome work